The Capital Times has a story this week about the intersection of Pirie Street and Kent Terrace, saying that motorists are frustrated at the long delays when trying to exit Pirie Street for Kent and Cambridge Terraces.
As many locals will know, it's potentially a long wait at the lights. The Capital Times explores the idea that recent (well, actually not so recent) changes to the intersection have resulted in much longer delays for Pirie Street drivers. This is put down to pedestrians suddenly being acknowledged as legitimate road users by the traffic engineers. So far, so good - it's an interesting hypothesis, and definitely worth investigation.
.png)
Then into the discussion leaps Wellington City Council spokesperson Richard MacLean, who in a flash of lateral thinking proceeds to blame the Mt Victoria Residents Association for the changes and resulting delays! It's a fantastic story - those pesky and pushy residents have been disrupting the flow of traffic due to their unreasonable demands! Blame them!
If only it were true.
What Mr MacLean omitted to do was any actual research. If he had, he would have discovered - as we did - that the intersection forms part of State Highway One, and is therefore one of Transport Minister Steven Joyce's Roads of National Significance™. The phasing of the traffic lights is therefore governed by the NZ Transport Agency, to which the Wellington City Council makes requests when changes are sought to the operation of the intersection.
When local residents asked for improvements to the pedestrian signaling, it required the intervention of the Mayor and the Council's traffic engineers to get the NZ Transport Agency to make a trivial alteration to the phasing. And the change truly was minor - we asked that when you pressed the Walk button on Kent Terrace, it activated the lights on Cambridge Terrace and vice-versa. That's it. No changes to the phasing for cars were requested, nor made (as far as we know). Even so, getting the alteration took nearly a year - the NZ Transport Agency is not what you'd call "responsive".
However there is a reason why residents have a long wait at the bottom of Pirie Street; it's that Pirie Street is a local road, and State Highway traffic always has preference over local traffic. It's a deliberate policy, and the same approach is taken right around the country. This is because - in the mind of the NZ Transport Agency - keeping the traffic flowing on State Highway One adds economic value to the country, while waiting for the interminable traffic light change on a local road doesn't. Or something.
Thankfully, Mr MacLean goes on to suggest that local drivers use the Elizabeth Street intersection instead, which - as it turns out - is both a good idea and the one thing he managed to get right.
Mr Duston you appear to have badly misread the Capital Times story and you also appear not to have a firm grip on the workings of the media.
Capital Times rang the Council to try to find out why motorists in Pirie Street get such a short phase at the Kent Terrace lights. This is somewhat different to me 'leaping into the discussion'. All I was doing was answering their various questions. I told them that, to the best of my knowledge, the short phase stems from the fact Pirie Street traffic finishes a distant third, behind traffic on Vivian Street and Kent and Cambridge Terraces, in terms of priority through the intersection.
If you read the article again you may find that no-one, the MVRA included, was blamed for anything. I suggest you get over your persecution complex.
Regarding your comments about 'research', I'm glad to find that you have stumbled across the fact that the intersection forms part of State Highway 1. Please rest assured that most people at the Council, including me, are well aware of this fact. Vivian Street carries a very large amount of cross-town traffic - and it would always get priority in terms of traffic-light phasing regardless of whether it is classified as a State highway or not.
Richard MacLean - Wellington City Council Communications.
Richard,
Thanks for that clarification. Perhaps I did mis-read the article, but the quote "And on the pedestrian crossing times, he says it’s the result of being tweaked after complaints about not enough time to cross from the Mount Victoria Residents Association" obviously distracted me from whatever it was you were trying to say.
And it's true the fact that the intersection is part of State Highway One isn't exactly a secret, particularly around the Council. However neither the reporter nor most people I've spoken to seem to be aware of that fact, which is pretty material to the discussion. Perhaps it might have been helpful, therefore, if the Council spokesperson had mentioned it in the article ...
Kent I mentioned it several times to the Capital Times reporter. It appears, however, that Capital Times didn't think it important enough to include in the text. Perhaps you'd like to take it up with Dawn at the paper?
regards
Richard MacLean - WCC Comms